Monday, November 29, 2010
could it be wider?
Okay, question for those of you reading this: Would it fit on your monitor if the blog was wider? Would you like it better if it was wider? A friend's blog got me wondering about this, and apparently 960 is the new 800 (pixels, that is). I hate to go messin' with the website after I just did all that work, but maybe wider websites would be better?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
I like wider, at least a little. I also like 1 column too, with all the rest of the "stuff" at the bottom. Not very conventional, but allows bigger pics. Click my name to see what I mean.
Thanks! It'll definitely stay two-columns though. :-)
Been meaning to say that I'm glad I can read your blog again after you were having hosting issues! :)
Wider would work on my laptop, which is 1280x768 (16:9 widescreen). I think more people are using at least that resolution now. Or if they don't have widescreen, they are at least using 1024x768.
I love your new website, by the way. I like the clean look of the central beige column with the plum-colored background flanking it on either side (background color choice was no coincidence, I'm guessing?). The website looks stellar on my computer as it is now, and actually I prefer it not spread out across my widescreen display. But your blog's central column is not as wide as the central column on the rest of your website - so I think you could start by making your blog the same width to fit in uniformly.
I like it the way it is.
Well, as the Pontiac commercial once said, "Wider is better". Made me giggle though... ;-)
I knew somebody would go there. ;-)
Hi! Wider would look better on my screen.
And while I have never actually met your brother, yessss, he would be the one to make the "joke".
-CS
I'd like them wider.
lebron 15 shoes
nike react
nike shox for men
golden goose outlet
kd shoes
pandora jewelry official site
golden goose sneakers
golden goose
golden goose outlet
kyrie irving shoes
Post a Comment